From f39d7ee7e7490d49f1c5b9e6315dd8e6e1d9db34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil <nyamatongwe@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:38:30 +1000
Subject: Use SplitVector directly instead of throughSplitVectorWithRangeAdd
 which was only ever used by Partitioning.

---
 test/unit/testPartitioning.cxx | 23 -----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

(limited to 'test')

diff --git a/test/unit/testPartitioning.cxx b/test/unit/testPartitioning.cxx
index 7e12c2ff0..fc55b4da1 100644
--- a/test/unit/testPartitioning.cxx
+++ b/test/unit/testPartitioning.cxx
@@ -25,29 +25,6 @@ using namespace Scintilla::Internal;
 constexpr int lengthTestArray = 8;
 static const int testArray[lengthTestArray] = {3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
 
-// Test SplitVectorWithRangeAdd.
-
-TEST_CASE("SplitVectorWithRangeAdd") {
-
-	SplitVectorWithRangeAdd<int> svwra;
-
-	SECTION("IsEmptyInitially") {
-		REQUIRE(0 == svwra.Length());
-	}
-
-	SECTION("IncrementExceptEnds") {
-		svwra.InsertFromArray(0, testArray, 0, lengthTestArray);
-		svwra.RangeAddDelta(1, lengthTestArray-1, 1);
-		for (int i=0; i<svwra.Length(); i++) {
-			if ((i == 0) || (i == lengthTestArray-1))
-				REQUIRE((i+3) == svwra.ValueAt(i));
-			else
-				REQUIRE((i+4) == svwra.ValueAt(i));
-		}
-	}
-
-}
-
 // Test Partitioning.
 
 TEST_CASE("Partitioning") {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3