diff options
| author | Robin Haberkorn <rhaberkorn@fmsbw.de> | 2026-03-10 16:26:03 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Robin Haberkorn <rhaberkorn@fmsbw.de> | 2026-03-10 16:26:03 +0100 |
| commit | b8d8d5f87cbe9a4eec4ac410777c716e557b5466 (patch) | |
| tree | ea5a872cf4210e8d164f59dc7ed629d2d3b6940a | |
| parent | 66317e173c592817cfc7052b55a768e3ce7e4223 (diff) | |
testsuite: added ^ES test case
In TECO-11 pattern matching constructs do not allow backtracking,
while the PCREs currently generated do allow backtracking.
This would be easy to fix, but there should also be constructs
to re-enable the backtracking semantics.
I left only a Known Bug test case for the time being.
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/testsuite.at | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/testsuite.at b/tests/testsuite.at index d688c6e..6bc33e4 100644 --- a/tests/testsuite.at +++ b/tests/testsuite.at @@ -671,6 +671,12 @@ TE_CHECK([[@^Um{U.a Q.a-100000"<%.aMm'} 0Mm]], 0, ignore, ignore) AT_XFAIL_IF(true) AT_CLEANUP +AT_SETUP([Backtracking in patterns]) +# ^ES should be greedy and posessive +TE_CHECK([[@I/ /J :@S/^ES^X/"S(0/0)']], 0, ignore, ignore) +AT_XFAIL_IF(true) +AT_CLEANUP + AT_SETUP([Rub out from empty string argument]) # Should rub out the modifiers as well. # Will currently fail because it tries to execute `:@{`. |