| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
* we were basing the glib allocators on throwing std::bad_alloc just like
the C++ operators. However, this always was unsafe since we were throwing
exceptions across plain-C frames (Glib).
Also, the memory vtable has been deprecated in Glib, resulting in
ugly warnings.
* Instead, we now let the C++ new/delete operators work like Glib
by basing them on g_malloc/g_slice.
This means they will assert and the application will terminate
abnormally in case of OOM. OOMs cannot be handled properly anyway, so it is
more important to have a good memory limiting mechanism.
* Memory limiting has been completely revised.
Instead of approximating undo stack sizes using virtual methods
(which is unprecise and comes with a performance penalty),
we now use a common base class SciTECO::Object to count the memory
required by all objects allocated within SciTECO.
This is less precise than using global replacement new/deletes
which would allow us to control allocations in all C++ code including
Scintilla, but they are only supported as of C++14 (GCC 5) and adding compile-time
checks would be cumbersome.
In any case, we're missing Glib allocations (esp. strings).
* As a platform-specific extension, on Linux/glibc we use mallinfo()
to count the exact memory usage of the process.
On Windows, we use GetProcessMemoryInfo() -- the latter implementation
is currently UNTESTED.
* We use g_malloc() for new/delete operators when there is
malloc_trim() since g_slice does not free heap chunks properly
(probably does its own mmap()ing), rendering malloc_trim() ineffective.
We've also benchmarked g_slice on Linux/glib (malloc_trim() shouldn't
be available elsewhere) and found that it brings no significant
performance benefit.
On all other platforms, we use g_slice since it is assumed
that it at least does not hurt.
The new g_slice based allocators should be tested on MSVCRT
since I assume that they bring a significant performance benefit
on Windows.
* Memory limiting does now work in batch mode as well and is still
enabled by default.
* The old UndoTokenWithSize CRTP hack could be removed.
UndoStack operations should be a bit faster now.
But on the other hand, there will be an overhead due to repeated
memory limit checking on every processed character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* it must be initialized after the UI (Interface::main), so I added
a View::initialize() function
* the old initialize() method was renamed to setup()
* use a global instance of QRegister::view so it is guaranteed to
be destroyed only after any QRegisters that could still need it
* Document API adapted to work with ViewCurrent references
|
|
The user interface provides a Scintilla view abstraction and
every buffer is based on a view. All Q-Register strings use
a single dedicated view to save memory and initialization time
when using many string registers.
* this means we can finally implement a working lexer configuration
and it only has to be done once when the buffer is first added
to the ring. It is unnecessary to magically restore the lexer
styles upon rubout of EB (very hard to implement anyway). It
is also not necessary to rerun the lexer configuration macro
upon rubout which would be hard to reconcile with SciTECO's
basic design since every side-effect should be attached to a
character.
* this means that opening buffers is slightly slower now
because of the view initialization
* on the other hand, macros with many string q-reg operations
are faster now, since the document must no longer be changed
on the buffer's view and restored later on.
* also now we can make a difference between editing a document
in a view and changing the current view, which reduces UI calls
* the Document class has been retained as an abstraction about
Scintilla documents, used by QRegister Strings.
It had to be made virtual, so the view on which the document
is created can be specified by a virtual function.
There is no additional space overhead for Documents.
|
|
normally, since SciTECO is not a library, this is not strictly
necessary since every library should use proper name prefixes
or namespaces for all global declarations to avoid name clashes.
However
* you cannot always rely on that
* Scintilla does violate the practice of using prefixes or namespaces.
The public APIs are OK, but it does define global functions/methods,
e.g. for "Document" that clashed with SciTECO's "TECODocument" class at
link-time.
Scintilla can put its definitions in a namespace, but this feature
cannot be easily enabled without patching Scintilla.
* a "SciTECO" namespace will be necessary if "SciTECO" is ever to be
turned into a library. Even if this library will have only a C-linkage
API, it must ensure it doesn't clutter the global namespace.
So the old "TECODocument" class was renamed back to "Document"
(SciTECO::Document).
|
|
|
|
documents
* fixes search-replace commands when function keys are used since they rely on selections
not being disturbed
* will also be useful later when there may be other selections
|
|
* also encapsulates data properly (previously there were many public
attributes to avoid permission issues)
* new class also cares about saving/and restoring scroll state.
now, buffer/q-reg edits and temporary accesses do not reset
the scroll state anymore.
|
