From 62a9c8d112e33d1202c8562744bddfa102c1f96e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Haberkorn Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:25:48 +0300 Subject: ^W also rubs out/in `@` and `:` modifiers * It makes little sense to e.g. rub out until `I` in `@I/foo/`, but leave the `@` modifier. Modifiers have to be considered part of the command, even though the state machine is not currently modelled like that. --- doc/sciteco.7.template | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/sciteco.7.template b/doc/sciteco.7.template index c250728..2a97c02 100644 --- a/doc/sciteco.7.template +++ b/doc/sciteco.7.template @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ Miscelleaneous (modifier \fIdisabled\fP) T};T{ Rub out until the beginning of the last command, which is not a no-op (whitespace). +\(lq@\(rq and \(lq:\(rq modifiers are considered part of the command and also rubbed out. T} T{ Re-insert word/command @@ -542,6 +543,8 @@ Miscelleaneous T};T{ Re-insert next command from the rubbed-out command line including all subsequent no-ops (whitespace). +\(lq@\(rq and \(lq:\(rq modifiers are considered part of the command and +also re-inserted. T} T{ .SCITECO_TOPIC ^U -- cgit v1.2.3