aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/search.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com>2021-06-05 17:43:58 +0200
committerRobin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com>2021-06-05 17:43:58 +0200
commitae913ab6275ff746439a2d99f8a1550ec2e511ff (patch)
treefade465796b86ab17b0d7d1bc6862386f685524e /src/search.c
parenta5733728560d300774a4322ed18fc75b5946d4de (diff)
downloadsciteco-ae913ab6275ff746439a2d99f8a1550ec2e511ff.tar.gz
teco_memory_check() now checks for addition overflows and negative searches (<S>) for multiplication overflows
* Since the numbers come from "outside" (SciTECO scripts) this is easily possible, resulting either in missed checks or even memory corruption. * In particular, this fixes the "Searching with large counts" test case on 32-bit builds. Perhaps at least one CI build should be 32-bit?
Diffstat (limited to 'src/search.c')
-rw-r--r--src/search.c9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/search.c b/src/search.c
index 4c324a6..3ccecde 100644
--- a/src/search.c
+++ b/src/search.c
@@ -496,6 +496,15 @@ teco_do_search(GRegex *re, gint from, gint to, gint *count, GError **error)
gsize matched_size = sizeof(teco_range_t) * -*count;
/*
+ * matched_size could overflow.
+ * NOTE: Glib 2.48 has g_size_checked_mul() which uses
+ * compiler intrinsics.
+ */
+ if (matched_size / sizeof(teco_range_t) != -*count)
+ /* guaranteed to fail either teco_memory_check() or g_malloc() */
+ matched_size = G_MAXSIZE;
+
+ /*
* NOTE: It's theoretically possible that the allocation of the `matched`
* array causes an OOM if (-count) is large enough and regular
* memory limiting in teco_machine_main_step() wouldn't help.