aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/expressions.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-01-13updated copyright to 2025Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2024-11-23the search mode and current radix are mapped to __local__ Q-Registers ^X and ↵Robin Haberkorn1-11/+4
^R now (refs #17) * This way the search mode and radix are local to the current macro frame, unless the macro was invoked with :Mq. If colon-modified, you can reproduce the same effect by calling [.^X 0^X ... ].^X * The radix register is cached in the Q-Reg table as an optimization. This could be done with the other "special" registers as well, but at the cost of larger stack frames. * In order to allow constructs like [.^X typed with upcarets, the Q-Register specification syntax has been extended: ^c is the corresponding control code instead of the register "^".
2024-09-11the SciTECO parser is Unicode-based now (refs #5)Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
The following rules apply: * All SciTECO macros __must__ be in valid UTF-8, regardless of the the register's configured encoding. This is checked against before execution, so we can use glib's non-validating UTF-8 API afterwards. * Things will inevitably get slower as we have to validate all macros first and convert to gunichar for each and every character passed into the parser. As an optimization, it may make sense to have our own inlineable version of g_utf8_get_char() (TODO). Also, Unicode glyphs in syntactically significant positions may be case-folded - just like ASCII chars were. This is is of course slower than case folding ASCII. The impact of this should be measured and perhaps we should restrict case folding to a-z via teco_ascii_toupper(). * The language itself does not use any non-ANSI characters, so you don't have to use UTF-8 characters. * Wherever the parser expects a single character, it will now accept an arbitrary Unicode/UTF-8 glyph as well. In other words, you can call macros like M§ instead of having to write M[§]. You can also get the codepoint of any Unicode character with ^^x. Pressing an Unicode character in the start state or in Ex and Fx will now give a sane error message. * When pressing a key which produces a multi-byte UTF-8 sequence, the character gets translated back and forth multiple times: 1. It's converted to an UTF-8 string, either buffered or by IME methods (Gtk). On Curses we could directly get a wide char using wget_wch(), but it's not currently used, so we don't depend on widechar curses. 2. Parsed into gunichar for passing into the edit command callbacks. This also validates the codepoint - everything later on can assume valid codepoints and valid UTF-8 strings. 3. Once the edit command handling decides to insert the key into the command line, it is serialized back into an UTF-8 string as the command line macro has to be in UTF-8 (like all other macros). 4. The parser reads back gunichars without validation for passing into the parser callbacks. * Flickering in the Curses UI and Pango warnings in Gtk, due to incompletely inserted and displayed UTF-8 sequences, are now fixed.
2024-01-21updated copyright to 2024Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2023-04-05updated copyright to 2023Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2022-06-21updated copyright to 2022 and updated TODORobin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2021-05-30THE GREAT CEEIFICATION EVENTRobin Haberkorn1-275/+124
This is a total conversion of SciTECO to plain C (GNU C11). The chance was taken to improve a lot of internal datastructures, fix fundamental bugs and lay the foundations of future features. The GTK user interface is now in an useable state! All changes have been squashed together. The language itself has almost not changed at all, except for: * Detection of string terminators (usually Escape) now takes the string building characters into account. A string is only terminated outside of string building characters. In other words, you can now for instance write I^EQ[Hello$world]$ This removes one of the last bits of shellisms which is out of place in SciTECO where no tokenization/lexing is performed. Consequently, the current termination character can also be escaped using ^Q/^R. This is used by auto completions to make sure that strings are inserted verbatim and without unwanted sideeffects. * All strings can now safely contain null-characters (see also: 8-bit cleanliness). The null-character itself (^@) is not (yet) a valid SciTECO command, though. An incomplete list of changes: * We got rid of the BSD headers for RB trees and lists/queues. The problem with them was that they used a form of metaprogramming only to gain a bit of type safety. It also resulted in less readble code. This was a C++ desease. The new code avoids metaprogramming only to gain type safety. The BSD tree.h has been replaced by rb3ptr by Jens Stimpfle (https://github.com/jstimpfle/rb3ptr). This implementation is also more memory efficient than BSD's. The BSD list.h and queue.h has been replaced with a custom src/list.h. * Fixed crashes, performance issues and compatibility issues with the Gtk 3 User Interface. It is now more or less ready for general use. The GDK lock is no longer used to avoid using deprecated functions. On the downside, the new implementation (driving the Gtk event loop stepwise) is even slower than the old one. A few glitches remain (see TODO), but it is hoped that they will be resolved by the Scintilla update which will be performed soon. * A lot of program units have been split up, so they are shorter and easier to maintain: core-commands.c, qreg-commands.c, goto-commands.c, file-utils.h. * Parser states are simply structs of callbacks now. They still use a kind of polymorphy using a preprocessor trick. TECO_DEFINE_STATE() takes an initializer list that will be merged with the default list of field initializers. To "subclass" states, you can simply define new macros that add initializers to existing macros. * Parsers no longer have a "transitions" table but the input_cb() may use switch-case statements. There are also teco_machine_main_transition_t now which can be used to implement simple transitions. Additionally, you can specify functions to execute during transitions. This largely avoids long switch-case-statements. * Parsers are embeddable/reusable now, at least in parse-only mode. This does not currently bring any advantages but may later be used to write a Scintilla lexer for TECO syntax highlighting. Once parsers are fully embeddable, it will also be possible to run TECO macros in a kind of coroutine which would allow them to process string arguments in real time. * undo.[ch] still uses metaprogramming extensively but via the C preprocessor of course. On the downside, most undo token generators must be initiated explicitly (theoretically we could have used embedded functions / trampolines to instantiate automatically but this has turned out to be dangereous). There is a TECO_DEFINE_UNDO_CALL() to generate closures for arbitrary functions now (ie. to call an arbitrary function at undo-time). This simplified a lot of code and is much shorter than manually pushing undo tokens in many cases. * Instead of the ridiculous C++ Curiously Recurring Template Pattern to achieve static polymorphy for user interface implementations, we now simply declare all functions to implement in interface.h and link in the implementations. This is possible since we no longer hace to define interface subclasses (all state is static variables in the interface's *.c files). * Headers are now significantly shorter than in C++ since we can often hide more of our "class" implementations. * Memory counting is based on dlmalloc for most platforms now. Unfortunately, there is no malloc implementation that provides an efficient constant-time memory counter that is guaranteed to decrease when freeing memory. But since we use a defined malloc implementation now, malloc_usable_size() can be used safely for tracking memory use. malloc() replacement is very tricky on Windows, so we use a poll thread on Windows. This can also be enabled on other supported platforms using --disable-malloc-replacement. All in all, I'm still not pleased with the state of memory limiting. It is a mess. * Error handling uses GError now. This has the advantage that the GError codes can be reused once we support error catching in the SciTECO language. * Added a few more test suite cases. * Haiku is no longer supported as builds are instable and I did not manage to debug them - quite possibly Haiku bugs were responsible. * Glib v2.44 or later are now required. The GTK UI requires Gtk+ v3.12 or later now. The GtkFlowBox fallback and sciteco-wrapper workaround are no longer required. * We now extensively use the GCC/Clang-specific g_auto feature (automatic deallocations when leaving the current code block). * Updated copyright to 2021. SciTECO has been in continuous development, even though there have been no commits since 2018. * Since these changes are so significant, the target release has been set to v2.0. It is planned that beginning with v3.0, the language will be kept stable.
2017-03-03updated copyright to 2017Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2016-11-20fixed glib warnings about using g_mem_set_vtable() and revised memory limitingRobin Haberkorn1-4/+5
* we were basing the glib allocators on throwing std::bad_alloc just like the C++ operators. However, this always was unsafe since we were throwing exceptions across plain-C frames (Glib). Also, the memory vtable has been deprecated in Glib, resulting in ugly warnings. * Instead, we now let the C++ new/delete operators work like Glib by basing them on g_malloc/g_slice. This means they will assert and the application will terminate abnormally in case of OOM. OOMs cannot be handled properly anyway, so it is more important to have a good memory limiting mechanism. * Memory limiting has been completely revised. Instead of approximating undo stack sizes using virtual methods (which is unprecise and comes with a performance penalty), we now use a common base class SciTECO::Object to count the memory required by all objects allocated within SciTECO. This is less precise than using global replacement new/deletes which would allow us to control allocations in all C++ code including Scintilla, but they are only supported as of C++14 (GCC 5) and adding compile-time checks would be cumbersome. In any case, we're missing Glib allocations (esp. strings). * As a platform-specific extension, on Linux/glibc we use mallinfo() to count the exact memory usage of the process. On Windows, we use GetProcessMemoryInfo() -- the latter implementation is currently UNTESTED. * We use g_malloc() for new/delete operators when there is malloc_trim() since g_slice does not free heap chunks properly (probably does its own mmap()ing), rendering malloc_trim() ineffective. We've also benchmarked g_slice on Linux/glib (malloc_trim() shouldn't be available elsewhere) and found that it brings no significant performance benefit. On all other platforms, we use g_slice since it is assumed that it at least does not hurt. The new g_slice based allocators should be tested on MSVCRT since I assume that they bring a significant performance benefit on Windows. * Memory limiting does now work in batch mode as well and is still enabled by default. * The old UndoTokenWithSize CRTP hack could be removed. UndoStack operations should be a bit faster now. But on the other hand, there will be an overhead due to repeated memory limit checking on every processed character.
2016-02-15revised looping implementation, aggregating loops, sane $$ semantics, some ↵Robin Haberkorn1-28/+60
optimizationa and additional checks * undo tokens emitted by the expression stack no longer waste memory by pointing to the stack implementation. This uses some ugly C++ constant template arguments but saves 4 or 8 byte per undo token depending on the architecture. * Round braces are counted now and the return command $$ will use this information to discard all non-relevant brace levels. * It is an error to close a brace when none have been opened. * The bracing rules are still very liberal, allowing you to close braces in macros belonging to a higher call frame or leave them open at the end of a macro. While this is technically possible, it is perhaps a good idea to stricten these rules in some future release. * Loops no longer (ab)use the expression stack to store program counters and loop counters. This removes flow control from the responsibility of the expression stack which is much safer now since we can control where we jump to. This also eased implemented proper semantics for $$. * It is an error to leave loops open at the end of a macro or trying to close a loop opened in the caller of the macro. Similarily it is only possible to close a loop from the current invocation frame. This means it is now impossible to accidentally jump to invalid PCs. * Even though loop context stacks could be attached directly to the macro invocation frame, this would be inefficient. Instead there's a loop frame pointer now that is part of the invocation frame. All frames will reuse the same stack structure. * Loops are automatically discarded when returning using $$. * Special aggregating forms of the loop start (":<") and loop end (":>") commands are possible now and have been implemented. This improves SciTECO's capability as a stack-oriented language. It is no longer necessary to write recursive macros to generate stack values of arbitrary length dynamically or to process them. * All expression and loop stacks are still fixed-size. It may be a good idea to implement dynamic resizing (TODO). * Added some G_UNLIKELYs to Execute::macro(). Should improve the branch prediction of modern CPUs. * Local Q-Register tables are allocated on the stack now instead of on the heap (the bulk of a table is stored on the heap anyway). Should improve performance of macro invocations. * Document that "F<" will jump to the beginning of the macro if there is no loop. This is not in standard TECO, but I consider it a useful feature.
2016-02-10avoid unnecessary undo token allocations in batch mode: greatly speeds up ↵Robin Haberkorn1-2/+2
batch mode * by using variadic templates, UndoStack::push() is now responsible for allocating undo tokens. This is avoided in batch mode. * The old UndoStack::push(UndoToken *) method has been made private to avoid confusion around UndoStack's API. The old UndoStack::push() no longer needs to handle !undo.enabled, but at least asserts on it. * C++11 support is now required, so variadic templates can be used. This could have also been done using manual undo.enabled checks; or using multiple versions of the template with different numbers of template arguments. The latter could be done if we one day have to support a non-C++11 compiler. However since we're depending on GCC 4.4, variadic template use should be OK. Clang supports it since v2.9. * Sometimes, undo token pushing passed ownership of some memory to the undo token. The old behaviour was relied on to reclaim the memory even in batch mode -- the undo token was always deleted. To avoid leaks or repeated manual undo.enabled checking, another method UndoStack::push_own() had to be introduced that makes sure that an undo token is always created. In batch mode (!undo.enabled), this will however create the object on the stack which is much cheaper than using `new`. * Having to know which kind of undo token is to be pushed (taking ownership or not) is inconvenient. It may be better to add static methods to the UndoToken classes that can take care of reclaiming memory. * Benchmarking certain SciTECO scripts have shown 50% (!!!) speed increases at the highest possible optimization level (-O3 -mtune=native -march=native).
2016-01-28updated copyright to 2016Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2015-09-24cleaned up operator precedence codeRobin Haberkorn1-13/+18
* use small values for low precedence
2015-09-23different operators can have the same precedence nowRobin Haberkorn1-10/+24
* SciTECO now has the same operator precedence table as C. * It is numerically important whether different operators have the same precedence. E.g. "5*2/4" used to be evaluated by SciTECO as "5*(2/4)" since division had a higher precedence than multiplication. Within in real (!) numbers this would be the expected evaluation order. Users of other programming languages however would expect the expression to be evaluated as "(5*2)/4" which makes a numerical difference when working with integers. * Operator precedence has been implemented by encoding it into the enumeration values used to represent different operators. Calculating the precedence of a given operator can then be done very efficiently and elegantly (in our case using a plain right shift operation). * documentation updated. We use a precedence table now.
2015-07-22fixed operator precedence listRobin Haberkorn1-3/+3
* necessary since in SciTECO every operator has a different precedence. E.g. successive additions/subtractions cannot be evaluated from left to right (by their associativity). Perhaps this should be changed. * subtraction must have a higher precedence than addition, since (a+b)-c == a+(b-c) * division must have a higher precedence than multiplication since (a*b)/c == a*(b/c). This is not quite true for integer arithmetics. * this fixes expressions like 5-1+1 which were counterintuitively evaluated like 5-(1+1)
2015-03-17fixed invalid memory accesses in the expression stack and reworked ↵Robin Haberkorn1-37/+64
expression stack this was probably a regression from d94b18819ad4ee3237c46ad43a962d0121f0c3fe and should not be in v0.5. The return value of Expressions::find_op() must always be checked since it might not find the operator, returning 0 (it used to be 0). A zero index pointed to uninitialized memory - in the worst case it pointed to invalid memory resulting in segfaults. Too large indices were also not handled. This was probably responsible for recent PPA build issues. Valgrind/memcheck reports this error but I misread it as a bogus warning. I took the opportunity to clean up the ValueStack implementation and made it more robust by adding a few assertions. ValueStacks now grow from large to small addresses (like stack data structures usually do). This means, there is no need to work with negative indices into the stack pointer. To reduce the potential for invalid stack accesses, stack indices are now unsigned and have origin 0. Previously, all indices < 1 were faulty but weren't checked. Also, I added some minor optimizations.
2015-03-16added EL command for setting/getting the EOL modeRobin Haberkorn1-0/+12
2015-02-23implemented to undo stack memory limitingRobin Haberkorn1-2/+2
* acts as a safe-guard against uninterrupted infinite loops or other operations that are costly to undo in interactive mode. If we're out of memory, it is usually too late to react properly. This implementation tries to avoid OOMs due to SciTECO behaviour. We cannot fully exclude the chance of an OOM error. * The undo stack size is only approximated using the UndoToken::get_size() method. Other ways to measure the exact amount of allocated heap (including size fields in every heap object or using sbrk(0) and similar) are either costly in terms of memory or platform-specific. This implementation does not need any additional memory per heap object or undo token but exploits the fact that undo tokens are virtual already. The size of an undo token is determined at compile time. * Default memory limit of 500mb should be OK for most people. * The current limit can be queried with "2EJ" and set with <x>,2EJ. This also works interactively (a bit tricky!) * Limiting can be disabled. In this case, undo token processing is a bit faster. * closes #3
2015-02-11updated copyright to 2015Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2014-11-14added ^# (XOR) operatorRobin Haberkorn1-1/+2
also changed precedence of + operator (higher than minus). the effects of this should be minimal
2014-11-11refactored SciTECO runtime errors: moved from parser.cpp to error.cppRobin Haberkorn1-2/+2
* the GError expection has been renamed to GlibError, to avoid nameclashes when working from the SciTECO namespace
2014-11-11added all of SciTECO's declarations to the "SciTECO" namespaceRobin Haberkorn1-0/+4
normally, since SciTECO is not a library, this is not strictly necessary since every library should use proper name prefixes or namespaces for all global declarations to avoid name clashes. However * you cannot always rely on that * Scintilla does violate the practice of using prefixes or namespaces. The public APIs are OK, but it does define global functions/methods, e.g. for "Document" that clashed with SciTECO's "TECODocument" class at link-time. Scintilla can put its definitions in a namespace, but this feature cannot be easily enabled without patching Scintilla. * a "SciTECO" namespace will be necessary if "SciTECO" is ever to be turned into a library. Even if this library will have only a C-linkage API, it must ensure it doesn't clutter the global namespace. So the old "TECODocument" class was renamed back to "Document" (SciTECO::Document).
2014-02-15updated Copyright to year 2014Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2014-02-15report stack overflows as errors & fixed ValueStack dtorRobin Haberkorn1-1/+5
* ValueStack destruction might have resulted in Segfaults at shutdown
2013-03-17^E\ string building character to format numberRobin Haberkorn1-0/+2
* new Expressions::format() * may be used format numbers as part of arrays (Q-Register names)
2013-02-22use typedef for SciTECO integers and make it configurable at configure timeRobin Haberkorn1-7/+7
* storage size should always be 64 (gint64) to aid macro portability * however, for performance reasons users compiling from source might explicitly compile with 32 bit integers
2013-01-19updated copyright (2012-2013)Robin Haberkorn1-1/+1
2012-12-04added copyright notice to every source fileRobin Haberkorn1-0/+17
2012-12-04autoconf preparation: move everything into src/ subdirRobin Haberkorn1-0/+194